“Cascading Bids” And Direct Media Exchange
February 19th, 2008
It’s always fun trying to get people to ‘get’ what we’ve got going on for them here with Direct Media Exchange.
After all, we’re not selling plungers; we’re giving everyone an opportunity to help them manage the advertising on their websites and increase their revenue. We’re a free hosted ad server, but we also embrace things like openness, transparency, and the efficiency of an auction. Rather than look over each other’s backs, our members–advertisers and publishers alike—collaborate.
And I really like metaphors, so here’s one that describes DMX: it’s more like a waterfall. I might sound like I am trying to be cute, but I am dead serious…
If I may, I will quote Steve Jenkins of CheatCodes.com from our DMX forums (see his video interview here). Here’s how he explains it:
“As web publishers, most of us are probably familiar with cascading style sheets. I’ve set up our 3rd party ad networks in [DMX] as ‘cascading’ bids. Using actual eCPMs, frequency caps, and geo-targetting, I decide that Network A gets the first impression per visit, Network B gets the next 3, and then my ‘cleanup batter’ Network C gets the rest.
However - the internal [DMX] networks can be the ’spoiler’ - and they can stick their cup into the cascading waterfall and take away impressions from that cascading system ANY time they like, but they can only do so by paying more for whatever they place in their cup. And it happens often, sometimes between Network A and B, and more between Network B and C. This means that I am paid the most possible for EVERY impression delivered.“
- Steve Jenkins, CheatCodes.com
Our users get it. And their revenue is increasing because of it. If you’ve got it, great.
If not, sign up here.





