Let RMX Direct Carry Your Weight(ing)
November 3rd, 2006

Ok, a word on this other strategy:
If ad network #1 is paying a $1.00 CPM, and ad network #2 is paying a .50 CPM, you might send two impressions to network #1, and one impression to network #2. Why? Because you want to get more chances to make more money…and #1 seems pays more on average.
That was the basic premise behind this. It was a way to leverage your bets. And it helped you monetize more efficiently.
Right?
This approach doesn’t adjust in real time. Maybe ad network #2 will start paying a higher CPM for any number of reasons–and you’ll be losing money for as long as you don’t discover that their average price has changed. It also doesn’t take the value of each impression into account. What if your ad server sends two impressions from China to the network #1, and one impression from the USA to network #2? In this case, that may be the reverse of how those networks should receive the impressions to best monetize it.
In the long run, is this any worse than just watching your numbers and adjusting them every day for each network? For each ad size and placement? At each Ad network’s website?! Wow, it’s a full-blown hassle anyway you slice it.
Again, publishers have been tolerant of rough strategies like ‘daisy-chaining’ and ‘weighting’ because, hey–how else could they do business?
It changes with RMX Direct: everything gets bid on when you’re a member, and this includes 3rd party deals. Your inventory is valued higher since the highest bidder serves your ad.
Weighting and daisy chaining are totally obsolete.
We hope RMX Direct is taking a weight off your shoulders.





December 5th, 2006 at 4:19 pm
[…] One user, a while back, suggested that we allow ‘weighting’. If you’re curious about what weighting is, you can read more about it in this recent post. […]