Vince, TJ and Werds
August 29th, 2006
[16:42] VINCERMX: hey tj, you still here?
[16:42] TJRMX: yup
[16:42] VINCERMX: ok, did you see this post: http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=416580
[16:42] VINCERMX: I’ve got to reply to him…but first, I thought I would run it by you…
[16:42] TJRMX: yeah, perfect example of how we help solve these guys’ problems
[16:43] VINCERMX: ok..hold a second…
[16:44] VINCERMX: it was from N_F_S, one of the gurus over at sitepoint…here’s the quote:
[16:44] TJRMX: good deal
[16:45] VINCERMX: ‘’hmm, interesting, what about if I work with all them RMX- presented once in YM ? Will the CPM be better still over at RMX ?'’
[16:46] TJRMX: well, it sounds like what he’s referring to is finding the best way to compare network CPM’s…always the bottom line no?
[16:46] VINCERMX: yes…always comes down to money…
[16:46] TJRMX: this is exactly what RMXD does….except it does it automatically
[16:47] TJRMX: i mean, he can work with any 3rd Party network he wants, but most importantly, he can traffic those networks into RMXD
[16:48] TJRMX: by virute of RMXD’s networks competing against one another to serve ads, as well as competing against his 3rd Party netwroks, he’s going to get the highest CPM possible on every ad call
[16:48] TJRMX: he wouldn’t have to guess anymore ya’ dig?
[16:48] VINCERMX: ok, ok…I always thought the part about not defaulting any ads was key–suddenly, RMX Direct pubs don’t have to weight or daisychain their networks…
[16:51] TJRMX: any network that they traffic or link to in RMXD will have to prove its worth, it helps eliminate or reduce the need for any of the above..yes
[16:52] TJRMX: you all squared on this one then?
[16:52] VINCERMX: squared. thanks tj…
[16:52] TJRMX: werd
[16:52] VINCERMX: werd
And if you’re wondering what the ‘werd’ is , we are still giving out beta invites at: direct.rightmedia.com
